RE: DLSW Question

From: Luis Miguel Gil (lmgil@intecno.net)
Date: Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:34:49 GMT-3

• Next message: PIEDRAHITA, JOHN, MGSVC: "Lab Partner in Dutchess/Putnam, NY and Fairfield, CT Areas"
• Previous message: Peter: "Re: legal document for take lab in Brussels"
• Maybe in reply to: Voss, David: "DLSW Question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

option 2. (200)
ring number has nothing to do with the cann or non-can mess.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Michael Snyder
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 4:11 PM
To: 'Voss, David'
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: DLSW Question

Thank heavens that dlsw ring numbers are going bye bye when they pull
token ring out of the lab. Ethernet doesn't have ring numbers.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Voss, David
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:28 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW Question

I have been asked to create a DLSW session in my network using ring
0xC8.

I believe I can take this one of two ways:

#1 convert from canonical format, c8 = 13, so implement DLSW using
ring-number 13

or

#2 convert to decimal, c8 = 1100 1000, which equals 200, ring-number 200

Does anyone have any input on this?

• Next message: PIEDRAHITA, JOHN, MGSVC: "Lab Partner in Dutchess/Putnam, NY and Fairfield, CT Areas"
• Previous message: Peter: "Re: legal document for take lab in Brussels"
• Maybe in reply to: Voss, David: "DLSW Question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:44:03 GMT-3