RE: DLSW Question

From: Voss, David (dvoss@heidrick.com)
Date: Wed Sep 25 2002 - 00:19:19 GMT-3

• Next message: Richard Davidson: "Has any one read any of the following books?"
• Previous message: Richard Davidson: "Has any one read any of the following books?"
• Maybe in reply to: Voss, David: "DLSW Question"
• Next in thread: Michael Snyder: "RE: DLSW Question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks all. Just tried it by entering 0xc8 and it worked.

Rack7R3(config)#dlsw ring-list 1 rings ?
  <1-4095> Physical or virtual ring number
 
Rack7R3(config)#dlsw ring-list 1 rings 0xc8

Rack7R3#sh run

!
!
dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.1.3.3
dlsw ring-list 1 rings 200
!
!

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Shah [mailto:nshah@connect.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:14 PM
To: Voss, David; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DLSW Question

David

Unless there is some 'trick' to this question (trick question in the lab
that you are doing). 0xC8 would translate to RING 200.

rgds
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Voss, David" <dvoss@heidrick.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:28 PM
Subject: DLSW Question

> I have been asked to create a DLSW session in my network using ring 0xC8.
>
> I believe I can take this one of two ways:
>
> #1 convert from canonical format, c8 = 13, so implement DLSW using
> ring-number 13
>
> or
>
> #2 convert to decimal, c8 = 1100 1000, which equals 200, ring-number 200
>
> Does anyone have any input on this?

• Next message: Richard Davidson: "Has any one read any of the following books?"
• Previous message: Richard Davidson: "Has any one read any of the following books?"
• Maybe in reply to: Voss, David: "DLSW Question"
• Next in thread: Michael Snyder: "RE: DLSW Question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:44:02 GMT-3