From: Larson, Chris (CLarson@usaid.gov)
Date: Tue Sep 24 2002 - 14:59:46 GMT-3
Nat? It would be depending on your Nat pool. If you are overloading a single
IP doing PAT then it is 65535 I believe. Or 1 translation for every port.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Imo Etuk [SMTP:ietuk@comcast.net]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:31 PM
> To: Chuck Church; jay@west.net; elpingu@acedsl.com
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: NAT oh NAt (part deux)
>
> Okay all,
>
> here is where we stand. We have decided to implement a PIX firewall as
> opposed to using the 6506 to perform NAT. That old adage let a router
> route
> and let a firewall do just that firewall. Does anyone know how many active
> NAT translations a PIX firewall is capable of?
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Imo
> Warning : The information contained in this message may be privileged and
> confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message
> is
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
> you
> have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your
> computer.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:44:01 GMT-3