From: Nick Shah (nshah@connect.com.au)
Date: Sat Sep 21 2002 - 23:19:58 GMT-3
The second session was meant to be an ebgp multihop from R8 --- >R2 (and not
R1, as incorrectly stated by myself)
rgds
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: kpalmer <kip.palmer@verizon.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 11:16 AM
Subject: BGP Attrib ?
> BGP Question:
>
> Can I have an AS receive a route from a EBGP neighbor and not install it
> in either
> IP or BGP tables, but still advertise it to an EBGP peer? The
> requirement is configure
> R8 so that R1 only sees 150.x.x.x. AND.... configure R8 so that the
> route 160.100.0.0
> appears to R2 as if it has passed through AS 1.
>
>
> as300 as400 as200
> r2---------r1---------r8 |r8 advertising routes 160. and 150.
>
>
>
> The later is a prepend thing, but also means that AS 400 has to
> receive and pass the route? ...without installing it?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Kip Palmer
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:59 GMT-3