From: Prakash H Somani (pdsccie@rediffmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 19 2002 - 04:16:04 GMT-3
Hi,
There is one more issue also regarding this...
R2 is connected to R5 on P-T-M subinterface. now at R2 I have
configured dlsw light. (With Frame-relay <dlci> and Frame-relay
map llc command) and on R5 i have configured promiscus...
The peers are never coming up why ?
regards....Prakash
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 Mingzhou Nie wrote :
>beda,
>
>dlsw direct will not work on any type of subinterfaces but main
>interface. dlsw lite will work on subinterfaces as well as main
>interface. With p-to-p interface, no "frame map llc2 <dlci>" is
>needed.
>
>http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200204/threads.html
>search on "DSLW direct encap --Peer disconnected"
>
>Ming
>
>--- beda jain <bpjain@cisco.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > does Dlsw lite work in frame-relay multipoint interface or
>not.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Beda
> >
> > At 10:17 AM 9/17/2002 -0700, Mingzhou Nie wrote:
> > >donny,
> > >
> > >this question has been asked several times in the past. I'm
> > resending
> > >my personal notes again.
> > >
> > >****
> > >- encapsulation: watch out direct encap and llc2(dlsw lite)
>encap.
> > both
> > >reference individual dlci, but the first one needs
>"pass-thru"
> > option
> > >at the end and map dlci to dlsw, vs. the latter one doesn't
>use
> > >"pass-thru" and map dlci to llc2. direct encap only works on
>main
> > >interface. and direct encap doesn't work with backup peer.
>you can
> > not
> > >configure ip address in "dlsw local-peer" statement.
> >
> >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/dls3_rg.htm
> >
> >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/idg4/nd2007.htm#xtocid31
> >
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200201/msg00583.html
> >
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200111/msg00784.html
> >
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200201/msg00945.html
> > >
> > >****
> > >
> > >
> > >--- Chris Hugo <chrishugo@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > Remote Peer stays the same with both.Just the map
>statements will
> > > > differ
> > > > frame-relay map LLC2 is "DLSW Lite" --Which has local
> > acknowledgment
> > > > frame-relay map DLSW is Direct Encapsulation--Which does
>not have
> > > > local acknowledgment
> > > > I'm sure others will add to the post. But here is some
>before I
> > sleep
> > > > :)
> > > > chris hugo
> > > > Donny MATEO wrote: Hi Group,
> > > >
> > > > I need help to clarify what is the difference between
>these two
> > > > configs for DLSW direct
> > > > encapsulation :
> > > >
> > > > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 0
> > > > int s0
> > > > frame-relay map llc2 131
> > > >
> > > > and
> > > >
> > > > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 0 131
> > > > int s0
> > > > frame-relay map dlsw 131
> > > >
> > > > Solie says to use the latter for a multipoint interface. I
>tried
> > the
> > > > latter, but the state seems to
> > > > stay at disconnect. If I add the statement frame-relay map
>llc2
> > 131,
> > > > then it would become connect.
> > > >
> > > > Any clue ?
> > > >
> > > > tks.
> > > > Donny
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This message is for information purposes only and its
>content
> > > > should not be construed as an offer, or solicitation of an
>offer,
> > > > to buy or sell any banking or financial instruments or
>services
> > > > and no representation or warranty is given in respect of
>its
> > > > accuracy, completeness or fairness. The material is
>subject
> > > > to change without notice. You should take your own
>independent
> > > > tax, legal and other professional advice in respect of
>the
> > content
> > > > of this message. This message may contain confidential
>or
> > > > legally privileged material and may not be copied,
>redistributed
> > > > or published (in whole or in part) without our prior
>written
> > consent.
> > > > This email may have been intercepted, partially
>destroyed,
> > > > arrive late, incomplete or contain viruses and no
>liability is
> > > > accepted by any member of the Credit Agricole Indosuez
>group
> > > > as a result. If you are not the intended recipient of
>this
> > message,
> > > > please immediately notify the sender and delete this
>message
> > > > from your computer.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> > >
> > >
> > >__________________________________________________
> > >Do you Yahoo!?
> > >Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> > >http://news.yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
>http://news.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:56 GMT-3