From: Nick Shah (nshah@connect.com.au)
Date: Wed Sep 18 2002 - 01:54:08 GMT-3
Omer
My thinking is that both should be the same. Ideally the packets are
submitted to the physical interface for delivery (and hence queuing applied
there should work).
Thoughts ??
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Omer Ansari" <omer@ansari.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:44 AM
Subject: custom queuing under a frame interface
> All,
>
> in the following, is "A" different from "B" ?
> [assume queue list is same for both and only 2 subifs]
>
> A
> =====
> !
> interface Serial2/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> !
> interface Serial2/0.1 multipoint
> ip address 165.10.1.4 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay class cq <---------------
> ...
> !
> interface Serial2/0.2 point-to-point
> ip address 165.10.5.4 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay class cq <-------------
> ...
> !
> map-class frame-relay cq
> no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
> frame-relay custom-queue-list 2
> !
>
>
>
> B
> =====
>
> !
> interface Serial2/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> custom-queue-list 2 <-------------
> !
> interface Serial2/0.1 multipoint
> ip address 165.10.1.4 255.255.255.0
> ...
> !
> !
> interface Serial2/0.2 point-to-point
> ip address 165.10.5.4 255.255.255.0
> ...
>
>
>
>
> Assuming the answer to above would apply to priority queue list also.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:55 GMT-3