Re: 3550 SMI vs. EMI

From: alee@cccis.com
Date: Fri Sep 13 2002 - 15:57:14 GMT-3

Next message: Blanco Lam: "OT: MicroAnnex ELS"
Previous message: Brent Stewart: "RE: Xyplex Terminal Server help"
Maybe in reply to: Joe Martin: "3550 SMI vs. EMI"
Next in thread: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de: "RE: 3550 SMI vs. EMI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Joe,

According to Cisco, SMI(Standard Multilayer Software Image) only support
Layer 2 and basic Layer 3 routing. EMI(Enhanced Multilayer Software Image)
support Layer 2 and advanced Layer 3 routing feature. So, sounds like EMI
has more features than SMI image. Such as "IP unicast routing" is only
supported by EMI.

Arthur Lee

                      "Joe Martin"
                      <jmartin@capitalp To: "CCIE GroupStudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
                      remium.net> cc:
                      Sent by: Subject: 3550 SMI vs. EMI
                      nobody@groupstudy
                      .com


                      09/13/2002 01:13
                      PM
                      Please respond to
                      "Joe Martin"

Just a quick, perhaps silly, question. Is the only difference between the
EMI and the SMI the software image?

Next message: Blanco Lam: "OT: MicroAnnex ELS"
Previous message: Brent Stewart: "RE: Xyplex Terminal Server help"
Maybe in reply to: Joe Martin: "3550 SMI vs. EMI"
Next in thread: Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de: "RE: 3550 SMI vs. EMI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:51 GMT-3