From: Angelo De Guzman (ghie_pogi@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Sep 12 2002 - 03:20:39 GMT-3
I think it means you can't use multiple frame relay
maps on your spokes. Or you can't map ip addresses to
the local DLCI. I could be wrong.
Ciao,
Angelo
--- Peng Zheng <zpnist@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering what's the second requirement means:
>
> 2. Solve the problem via layer 3
>
> How to decide which layer I'm using?
>
>
> Thank you for help.
>
> Best Wishes,
> Peng Zheng
>
>
> --- Nick Shah <nshah@connect.com.au> wrote:
> > you could use tunnels .. I am positive that a p2p
> > tunnel (the number of
> > tunnels will depend on number of spokes) will
> work.
> > But a P2MP tunnel (not
> > tried) should also work.. Try it out if you have
> > time :)
> >
> > Now the question arises as to whether the 'tunnel
> > solution' is a L3 solution
> > or a L2 solution :)
> >
> > Enjoy
> > Nick
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Angelo De Guzman" <ghie_pogi@yahoo.com>
> > To: "Jason Sinclair" <sinclairj@powertel.com.au>;
> > "'Peter van Oene'"
> > <pvo@usermail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:43 PM
> > Subject: RE: OSPF and NBMA
> >
> >
> > > Thanks to all! I was able to make it work
> with
> > > policy routing.
> > >
> > > In this lab the ff. needs to be satisfied
> > > 1. dont use the ip ospf network command
> > > 2. Solve the problem via layer 3
> > >
> > > Is there any other way to solve this problem
> other
> > > than policy routing?
> > >
> > > Many Thanks,
> > > Angelo De Guzman
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Jason Sinclair <sinclairj@powertel.com.au>
> > wrote:
> > > > Peter,
> > > >
> > > > I agree - and unless the lab specifically
> calls
> > for
> > > > it why would you expend
> > > > the effort. I know the lab is based on "non
> real
> > > > world" scenarios, however I
> > > > do advocate sticking to what we would do in
> the
> > > > "real world" where possible.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Jason Sinclair CCIE #9100
> > > > Manager, Network Control Centre
> > > > POWERTEL
> > > > 55 Clarence Street,
> > > > SYDNEY NSW 2000
> > > > AUSTRALIA
> > > > office: + 61 2 8264 3820
> > > > mobile: + 61 416 105 858
> > > > email: sinclairj@powertel.com.au
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Peter van Oene [mailto:pvo@usermail.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 12 September 2002 03:03
> > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: RE: OSPF and NBMA
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Edward.
> > > >
> > > > I did understand his point but don't think he
> > > > understood mine. I was
> > > > simply suggesting that point to point
> > sub-interfaces
> > > > would be a better way
> > > > to deal with topology. I'm not a big fan of
> > kludges
> > > > like policy routing.
> > > >
> > > > At 10:59 AM 9/11/2002 -0600, Edward Monk
> wrote:
> > > > >Peter,
> > > > >
> > > > >Policy routing
> > > > >
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > > >McClure, Allen
> > > > >Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:41 AM
> > > > >To: Peter van Oene; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > >Subject: RE: OSPF and NBMA
> > > > >
> > > > >Via layer3? Sounds like a route-map.
> > > > >
> > > > >Allen McClure
> > > > >MCSE, CCNP, CCDP
> > > > >YUM! Brands, Inc.
> > > > >Sr. Network Analyst
> > > > >NEW E-Mail - mailto:allen.mcclure@yum.com
> > > > >972-338-7494
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: Peter van Oene
> [mailto:pvo@usermail.com]
> > > > >Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:55 PM
> > > > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > >Subject: Re: OSPF and NBMA
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >point to point sub interfaces come to mind.
> > > > >
> > > > >At 06:29 PM 9/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> > > > > >To All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > R1 R2 R3 R4 ---- R6
> > > > > > \ \ / /
> > > > > > \ \ / /
> > > > > > \ \ / /
> > > > > > R5
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is a Hub and spoke topology. Wanted
> > to
> > > > have reachability to all
> > > > >
> > > > > >network. Frame-relay cloud is in area 0. R1
> > has
> > > > another area w/c is 1
> > > > > >and R2 has 2 and so on. I don't want to use
> > > > frame-relay map to reach
> > > > > >the other spokes. I need to solve this
> > problem
> > > > via
> > > > > >Layer 3.
> > > > > >Any ideas?
> > > > > >Thanks,
> > > > > >Angelo De Guzman
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> > > > > >Yahoo! - We Remember
> > > > > >9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000
> lives
> > lost
> > > > > >http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute
> > > > >This communication is confidential and may be
> > > > legally privileged. If
> > > > >you are not the intended recipient, (i)
> please
> > do
> > > > not read or disclose
> > > > >to others, (ii) please notify the sender by
> > reply
> > > > mail, and (iii) please
> > > > >delete this communication from your system.
> > > > Failure to follow this
> > > > >process may be unlawful. Thank you for your
> > > > cooperation.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
**********************************************************************
> > > > PowerTel Limited, winners of
> > > > Broadband Wholesale Carrier of the year,
> > CommsWorld
> > > > Telecomms Awards 2001
> > > > Best Emerging Telco, Australian Telecom Awards
> > 2001
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
**********************************************************************
> > > > This email (including all attachments) is
> > intended
> > > > solely for the named
> > > > addressee. It is confidential and may contain
> > > > commercially sensitive
>
=== message truncated ===
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:49 GMT-3