From: Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell) (JPaglia@NA2.US.ML.com)
Date: Wed Sep 11 2002 - 17:07:49 GMT-3
Ooops! Sorry!!!! I only read these e-mails at work, and in my
half-attentiveness, I transposed the words "fram-relay map" w/ "ip ospf
net", and didn't realize it until a sent my reply.
Please disregard..I'll be more careful in the future.
Pags
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Dennis [SMTP:brian@5g.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:16 PM
> To: 'Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell)'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: OSPF and NBMA
>
> Pags,
> How is setting the OSPF priority and using the OSPF neighbor command
> going to fix the issue with spokes trying to communicate with other
> spokes without frame-relay mappings?
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP Dial)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell)
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 7:40 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: OSPF and NBMA
>
> OSPF Priorities should allow ospf neighbors to be created without use of
> map
> statements.
>
> Pags
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Angelo De Guzman [SMTP:ghie_pogi@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:30 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: OSPF and NBMA
> >
> > To All,
> >
> > R1 R2 R3 R4 ---- R6
> > \ \ / /
> > \ \ / /
> > \ \ / /
> > R5
> >
> > This is a Hub and spoke topology. Wanted to have
> > reachability to all network. Frame-relay cloud is in
> > area 0. R1 has another area w/c is 1 and R2 has 2 and
> > so on. I don't want to use frame-relay map to reach
> > the other spokes. I need to solve this problem via
> > Layer 3.
> > Any ideas?
> > Thanks,
> > Angelo De Guzman
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Yahoo! - We Remember
> > 9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
> > http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:49 GMT-3