RE: OSPF and NBMA

From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Wed Sep 11 2002 - 14:02:41 GMT-3

• Next message: Robert Wagner: "Which "Lab Preparation" classes are ranked the best? and"
• Previous message: Edward Monk: "RE: OSPF and NBMA"
• Maybe in reply to: Angelo De Guzman: "OSPF and NBMA"
• Next in thread: Brian Dennis: "RE: OSPF and NBMA"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks Edward.

I did understand his point but don't think he understood mine. I was
simply suggesting that point to point sub-interfaces would be a better way
to deal with topology. I'm not a big fan of kludges like policy routing.

At 10:59 AM 9/11/2002 -0600, Edward Monk wrote:
>Peter,
>
>Policy routing
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>McClure, Allen
>Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:41 AM
>To: Peter van Oene; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: OSPF and NBMA
>
>Via layer3? Sounds like a route-map.
>
>Allen McClure
>MCSE, CCNP, CCDP
>YUM! Brands, Inc.
>Sr. Network Analyst
>NEW E-Mail - mailto:allen.mcclure@yum.com
>972-338-7494
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Peter van Oene [mailto:pvo@usermail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:55 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: OSPF and NBMA
>
>
>point to point sub interfaces come to mind.
>
>At 06:29 PM 9/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> >To All,
> >
> > R1 R2 R3 R4 ---- R6
> > \ \ / /
> > \ \ / /
> > \ \ / /
> > R5
> >
> > This is a Hub and spoke topology. Wanted to have reachability to all
>
> >network. Frame-relay cloud is in area 0. R1 has another area w/c is 1
> >and R2 has 2 and so on. I don't want to use frame-relay map to reach
> >the other spokes. I need to solve this problem via
> >Layer 3.
> >Any ideas?
> >Thanks,
> >Angelo De Guzman
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Yahoo! - We Remember
> >9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
> >http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute
>This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If
>you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose
>to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please
>delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this
>process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.

• Next message: Robert Wagner: "Which "Lab Preparation" classes are ranked the best? and"
• Previous message: Edward Monk: "RE: OSPF and NBMA"
• Maybe in reply to: Angelo De Guzman: "OSPF and NBMA"
• Next in thread: Brian Dennis: "RE: OSPF and NBMA"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:48 GMT-3