From: Frank Jimenez (franjime@cisco.com)
Date: Mon Sep 09 2002 - 21:03:56 GMT-3
The interfaces are all the same. The SMI image has only limited Layer 3
functionality. The EMI image is the full-featured Layer 3 engine.
Frank Jimenez
franjime@cisco.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Becky Qiang
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:21 PM
To: Walker, Todd; Persio Pucci; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Cat3550 on CCIE Lab
what's the difference between AMI interfaces vs. the EMI
interfaces?...Becky
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walker, Todd" <todd.walker@seurat.com>
To: "Persio Pucci" <persiopucci@uol.com.br>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:00 PM
Subject: RE: Cat3550 on CCIE Lab
> My understanding is EMI. So you've got additional routers in the pod
> now.
There will be 2 3550's now, right?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Persio Pucci [mailto:persiopucci@uol.com.br]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:22 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Cat3550 on CCIE Lab
>
>
> Folks,
>
> does anybody have any idea if they are going to use the Cat3550 with
> SMI
or
> EMI after November 4th?
>
> Regards,
>
> Persio
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:47 GMT-3