From: Peng Zheng (zpnist@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Sep 09 2002 - 14:26:31 GMT-3
Maybe I'm wrong.
But I think it's same problem if you want to change
the distance of eigrp.
For the tunnel, it learned a eigrp route with AD 109,
but the the physical connection has a AD 110.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
--- Omer Ansari <omer@ansari.com> wrote:
> Peng et al.
>
> actually I was referring to the distance command
> under eigrp matching
> specific ACL (not changing distance for internal and
> external eigrp)
> e.g.
> router eigrp XX
> ...
> distance 109 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 39
>
> where acl39 matches 150.1.30/24
>
>
> the above has not worked for me. even specifying the
> next hop has been
> fruitless.
>
> as per the recursive issue, Hansang is referring to
> this URL:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/gre_flap.html
>
> omer
>
> On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Peng Zheng wrote:
>
> > I got this from previou reply:
> >
> > In theory, one of the solutions would be to change
> the
> > distance on all EIGRP routes coming into R4 with
> > "distance eigrp 90 105" but it turns
> > out that this causes a recursive routing loop
> which
> > causes the tunnel to flap up and down (long
> > explanation) so that solution is no good.
> >
> > I don't know why.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Omer Ansari <omer@ansari.com> wrote:
> > > Peng,
> > >
> > > when using distance cmd with ospf, you have to
> match
> > > against the RouterID
> > > of the route and not the next hop IP address.
> > >
> > > so in this case you could do
> > > distance 171 150.1.3.3 0.0.0.0 1
> > >
> > > where acl 1 matches 150.1.30.0/24
> > >
> > > i however still stick to 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
> in
> > > the distance command,
> > > as in the lab it is more often that you're
> learning
> > > the route you're
> > > trying to manipulate via more than 1ospf router.
> > >
> > >
> > > also this brings up a question i have been
> thinking
> > > about..
> > >
> > > why doesn't the distance command work well under
> the
> > > eigrp configuration?
> > > is it because it already has two predefined AD's
> (90
> > > and 170) and ignore
> > > further attempts to tamper with the distance?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Peng Zheng wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm wondering why distance 171 0.0.0.0
> > > 255.255.255.255
> > > > is used under ospf in R4?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for help.
> > > >
> > > > Best Wishes,
> > > > Peng Zheng
> > > >
> > > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
> > > > http://finance.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:47 GMT-3