RE: BGP Confederations

From: Meyer, J. (Johan) (JohanMe@nedcor.com)
Date: Thu Sep 05 2002 - 05:21:31 GMT-3


Sorry But it should read 2001,2002 respectively
I have seen Doyle II explanation and it does not cover the configs for the
end devices such as R5
in the example below?
 
Thanks
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Hugo [mailto:chrishugo@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:05 AM
To: Meyer, J. (Johan); ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: BGP Confederations

Hi Johan,

Your BGP Confed ID should remain consistent within your confederation. I am
not sure why you are using both 2001 and 2002. Just one Confed ID will do.
This ID will be represented to your external peering partner (outside of
your confederation).

Halabi and Doyle II goes into this greatly.

hth,

chris hugo

 "Meyer, J. (Johan)" wrote:

Hi

I would like some clarification on BGP confederation configs

I have the following setup

BB1 BB2
I I
R1-----R2---------R3---------R4-----------R5

R2 and R3 are in AS 65001 and AS 65002 respectively
Both R2 and R3 have the commands BGP Confederation Peers of 65001 ,65002 and
BGP Confederation ID of 2001 2002
My question is do R1,R4 and R5 need the BGP Confederation commands aswell??
As I have configured them without and all BGP connectivity seems to be
working?

Many Thanks
Johan
  _____

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! <http://rd.yahoo.com/finance/mailsig/new/*http://finance.yahoo.com>
Finance - Get real-time stock quotes



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:44 GMT-3