RE: local policy routing

From: Jason Sinclair (sinclairj@powertel.com.au)
Date: Mon Sep 02 2002 - 23:02:46 GMT-3


Dmitry,

Top of my head - use no ip classless on R9. Also, debug ip policy and you
will see that you are not matching any packets with the route-map, hence
they will not be policy routed. Use an access-list to match your source
packets, add this to the route-map and all will work.

Cheers,

Jason Sinclair CCIE #9100
Manager, Network Control Centre
POWERTEL
55 Clarence Street,
SYDNEY NSW 2000
AUSTRALIA
office: + 61 2 8264 3820
mobile: + 61 416 105 858
email: sinclairj@powertel.com.au

 -----Original Message-----
From: Volkov, Dmitry (Toronto - BCE) [mailto:dmitry_volkov@ca.ml.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 3 September 2002 11:28
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: local policy routing

Hello group,

Could You please explain me what is wrong here R9(s0)----(s0)R12:
(I can't ping loopbacks on R12 from R9)

R9#
interface Ethernet0
 ip address 170.240.8.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial0
 ip address 50.100.1.9 255.255.255.0
 no fair-queue
!
ip local policy route-map test
ip classless
no ip http server
!
route-map test permit 10
 set ip default next-hop 50.100.1.12

sh ip ro
     170.240.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 170.240.8.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
     50.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 50.100.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0
r9#

R12#
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 7.7.7.7 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback1
 ip address 160.160.160.160 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial0
 ip address 50.100.1.12 255.255.255.0
!
ip classless
no ip http server

Thanks,

Dmitry



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:42 GMT-3