From: ying c (bf5tgh1@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Sep 02 2002 - 12:05:26 GMT-3
Hi,
Can someone explain why the solution provided for page
799 question 5 EIGRP/ISIS redistribution in page 961
is needed?
In page 961, Doyle explains that we don't need to do
anything when redistribute from ISIS into EIGRP,
because EIGRP external routes have higher AD 170. I
have no problems with this part. However, when we
redistribute from EIGRP into ISIS, he raises route
coming from EIGRP domain to 170, is this necessary? I
cannot see why we need it, because we redistribute
from a lower AD domain (EIGRP AD = 90) into a higher
AD domain (ISIS AD = 115). It seems to me that with or
without the distance manipulation added in page 961 we
should not see any differences in the routing table.
Maybe I'm missing something here.
Thanks,
Chang
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:41 GMT-3