From: Nick Shah (nshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Aug 30 2002 - 00:05:36 GMT-3
Peng
How many times have / are you going to use a Serial interface & or V.25 bis
?
As I said, you wont need to use it if using ISDN BRI interface.
rgds
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>
To: "Nick Shah" <nshah@connect.com.au>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: When dialer in-band should be used?
> But in p.409 CCIE FUNDAMENTALS NETWORK DESIGN AND CASE
> STUDIES SECOND EDITION,
>
> I got this:
>
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> interface bri2/0
> encapsulation ppp
> dialer rotary-group 1
> isdn spid1 0835866201
> isdn spid2 0835866401
>
> interface bri2/1
> encapsulation ppp
> dialer rotary-group 1
> isdn spid1 0835867201
> isdn spid2 0835867401
>
> interface Dialer1
> ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0
> encapsulation ppp
> dialer in-band
> dialer map ip 172.20.2.1 name kdt-nas 8358661
> dialer load-threshold 100 either
> dialer-group 1
> ppp authentication chap callin
> ppp multilink
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> And for dial-on-demand routing, dialer in-band always
> is used for serial interface.
>
> Any idea?
>
> Thank you for help.
>
> Best Wishes,
> Peng Zheng
>
>
>
> --- Nick Shah <nshah@connect.com.au> wrote:
> > Peng
> >
> > I have seen dialer in-band being used 'only' when
> > using async line/interface
> > connected to modems. So you can safely rule it out,
> > when using ISDN.
> >
> > Nick
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 11:22 AM
> > Subject: When dialer in-band should be used?
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I saw dialer in-band in some examples but in
> > others.
> > >
> > > How should I decide if I should use it?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you for help.
> > >
> > > Best Wishes,
> > > Peng Zheng
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:42 GMT-3