From: Brian Dennis (brian@xxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 27 2002 - 23:42:08 GMT-3
There isn't any additional configuration needed to receive v2 updates.
The default behavior for IP RIP on a Cisco router is to send v1 updates
and receive v1 and v2 updates.
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP Dial)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Volkov, Dmitry (Toronto - BCE)" <dmitry_volkov@ca.ml.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:28 AM
Subject: ip rip send version 1 2
> Hi,
>
> The following setup: (e0)R1(s1)---(rip)----(s0)R2
> r1#
> interface e0
> ip address 142.146.10.129 255.255.255.192
>
> interface s1
> ip rip send version 1 2
> ip address 142.146.1.10 255.255.255.0
>
> router rip
> network 146.142.0.0
>
> r2#
> interface s0
> ip address 142.146.1.7 255.255.255.0
>
> router rip
> network 146.142.0.0
> r2#sh ip ro
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 142.146.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
> C 142.146.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0
> R 142.146.10.128/26 [120/1] via 142.146.1.10, 00:00:22, Serial0
> C 133.7.7.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
> C 133.7.56.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
>
>
> Router 2 has RIP network /26 in his RT - acting as VLSM router
>
> So without any V2 related configuration on R2 and by enabling send v2
> updates on R1 we can make R2 to get any mask from R1
> What do You think: Can it be valid Lab solution classless/classfull
redist
> if R1 is redistr point? there is no any V2 configs on R2 :)
>
> Looks like RIP is capable to get both V1 and V2 updates by default.
>
> Dmitry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:39 GMT-3