From: Putti Dhamrongsirivadh (putti@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 28 2002 - 12:58:57 GMT-3
Hi
Do you guys have a sample config of igrp with tunneling?
rgds
putti
At 11:41 AM 8/28/2002 +1000, Nick Shah wrote:
>Yes, it can be considered a valid solution 'without enabling RIPv2'.
>
>On a side note, My observation is that RIP is much more flexible with the
>way you can inject VLSM into it.
>Secondary addressing etc. also works like a charm.
>IGRP is a ****, the only perfect way to make it talk vlsm is by tunnels.
>
>rgds
>Nick
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Volkov, Dmitry (Toronto - BCE)" <dmitry_volkov@ca.ml.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:28 AM
>Subject: ip rip send version 1 2
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following setup: (e0)R1(s1)---(rip)----(s0)R2
> > r1#
> > interface e0
> > ip address 142.146.10.129 255.255.255.192
> >
> > interface s1
> > ip rip send version 1 2
> > ip address 142.146.1.10 255.255.255.0
> >
> > router rip
> > network 146.142.0.0
> >
> > r2#
> > interface s0
> > ip address 142.146.1.7 255.255.255.0
> >
> > router rip
> > network 146.142.0.0
> > r2#sh ip ro
> > Gateway of last resort is not set
> >
> > 142.146.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
> > C 142.146.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0
> > R 142.146.10.128/26 [120/1] via 142.146.1.10, 00:00:22, Serial0
> > C 133.7.7.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
> > C 133.7.56.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> >
> >
> > Router 2 has RIP network /26 in his RT - acting as VLSM router
> >
> > So without any V2 related configuration on R2 and by enabling send v2
> > updates on R1 we can make R2 to get any mask from R1
> > What do You think: Can it be valid Lab solution classless/classfull redist
> > if R1 is redistr point? there is no any V2 configs on R2 :)
> >
> > Looks like RIP is capable to get both V1 and V2 updates by default.
> >
> > Dmitry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:39 GMT-3