From: ccie candidate (ccie1@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Aug 25 2002 - 18:05:18 GMT-3
im also counting my days to the big day ...i agree on the "how "strategy ...and
i add to it "how fast" :)
i also get worried when i see /32 routes ..i dont feel comfortable with them ho
wever they might show up normally when you have FR p to m subif.
enjoy .
--On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 14:55:50 Michael Snyder wrote: >It's a fine line between why and how. > >I'm counting days down to my lab, and everything has become how. > >I agree understanding why a single point of redistribution is much >easier to manage is important. But faced with the fact they ain't going >to give you single point of redistribution, assuming every >redistribution is multiple protocols over multiple routers may save you >both study time and lab time. > >All the rules and techniques that apply the multiple point also apply to >single point redistribution. > >Another thing I would pass on, is to be Highly Suspect of any /32 bit >routes. I've never had a /32 bit route that was at the right place at >the right time for the right reason. I've had plenty of /32 routes at >the wrong place for the wrong reason, at the wrong time. > >My strategy is to kill them on sight during redistribution, which is >easy to do with route maps. Now, the auto-grading in the Lab may have a >problem with this, but I don't care. 32 bit routes are the root of all >redistribution evil from my view point. > >Truly, any route smaller than your interface ip address statements can >and will cause problems. > >That's my how, and I'm sticking to it. > >Michael > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: ccie candidate [mailto:ccie1@lycos.com] >Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 2:02 PM >To: 'ccie candidate'; msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com >Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com >Subject: RE: single point of redistribution > > i agree on your point and it is my strategy as well ..however it is >better to understand why we do things ...the question is why it is >really needed (where some of the books they said for single point of >redistrubtions ..you dont have to worry about filters ) ...if i dont >have to worry then i can also save time ..right ? >-- > >On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 13:52:20 > Michael Snyder wrote: >>Be a control freak, yes, in general use tags and filters. >> >>Think of it this way, how much time is it going to take to figure out >>that you don't need to use them? >> >>How much time is it going to use them, considering that you need the >>practice anyway? The more you do, the faster you'll get. >> >>What if you do need them, and you thought you didn't? >> >>That will cost you big time. >> >>In a nutshell, be a control freak. >> >>Lock down anything you can, inverse arp, split horizon, dialer maps, >>etc. >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of >>ccie candidate >>Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 1:20 PM >>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com >>Subject: single point of redistribution >> >>guys ; >> >>when we have single point of redistribution ..is there any need for >>filters ?? and why or in which cases this is necessary >> >> >>thanks >> >>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:37 GMT-3