From: (jin10101010@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Aug 24 2002 - 11:49:05 GMT-3
It's difficult for me to show you full config.
But simple config is below.
Branch A:
router eigrp 1
net 172.25.0.0
no auto
interface e0
ip add 172.25.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip subnet-zero
ip classless
Center:
router eigrp 1
net 172.25.0.0
no auto
interface loop 0
ip add 172.25.0.1 255.255.255.0
interface e0
ip add 172.25.1.2 255.255.255.0
interface s0
ip add 172.25.3.1 255.255.255.0
en frame
frame map ip 172.25.3.2 18 broad
Branch B:
router eigrp 1
net 172.25.0.0
no auto
interface s0
ip add 172.25.3.2 255.255.255.0
en frame
frame map ip 172.25.3.1 18 broad
It could be some different ip address, but most of configuration is same.
And I think this config is basic.
>From: "Tommy C" <tkc9789@hotmail.com>
>To: jin10101010@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: Eigrp Question!
>Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 09:34:09 -0500
>
>Can you post configs for r1 and r2?
>
>
>>From: "jin" <jin10101010@hotmail.com>
>>Reply-To: "jin" <jin10101010@hotmail.com>
>>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>Subject: Re: Eigrp Question!
>>Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 20:47:22 +0900
>>
>>Thanks.
>>But I can't change the ip address of it. Because this network isn't
>>my own network.
>>My customer want to know why this network is shown at r3(Branch B)
>>but isn't shown at r1(Branch A).
>>I was talked about the ip addressing, I wanted to make it change to
>>other network not a 172.25.0.0/24.
>>But customer can't do it because of the one problem that they have
>>privately
>>
>>Your suggestion could be the one of many solution.
>>But I want to know the reason of this problem.
>>I think the problem like this one could be happened anywhere.
>>
>>I know 172.25.0.0 is class B major network. But I already enabled
>>the ip classless and ip subnet-zero. And eigrp is no auto-summary.
>>
>>Please help me..
>>TIA.
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Malcolm Price" <malcolm@lanbase.com>
>>To: "jin" <jin10101010@hotmail.com>
>>Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 8:42 PM
>>Subject: RE: Eigrp Question!
>>
>>
>> > Hi Jin,
>> >
>> > I'm not 100% about this, but there may be an issue using
>>172.25.0.0/24.
>> >
>> > i.e. your network address for r2's loopback is 172.25.0.0 and
>>the host ip is
>> > 172.25.0.1, with the major net address being 172.25.0.0 (class B
>>by right).
>> >
>> > On the surface it may be ok, but if there is some hidden flaw or
>>conflict in
>> > the ios that may cause you a problem. Try to use a different
>>subnet, just to
>> > throw out this theory.
>> >
>> > Let me know in anycase,
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Malcolm
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On
>>Behalf Of
>> > jin
>> > Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 10:52 AM
>> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> > Subject: Eigrp Question!
>> >
>> >
>> > My customer's network use the 172.25.0.0/24.
>> > We have no problem. But r2's loopback address is used for dlsw
>>connection in
>> > the promiscuous mode. Ip address of this interface is
>>172.25.0.1/24.
>> >
>> > Network is,
>> > branchA(r1) - HQ(r2)- BranchB(r3) and r1-r2 is metro ethernet
>>and r2-r3 is
>> > f/r.
>> >
>> > ip addressing is,
>> > r1:172.25.2.1/24 ---
>>172.25.2.2/24:r2:172.25.3.1/24---------172.25.3.2/24:r3
>> >
>> > Routing protocol is eigrp.
>> >
>> > if the loop back address of r2 is 172.25.0.1/24, why this
>>network isn't
>> > appeared on the r1 but I can see the network on the r3.
>> >
>> > on the r3, I can see the 172.25.0.0/24 but on the r1 I can't see
>>it.
>> >
>> > I don't understand.
>> > Please help me,cutomer is likely to drive into my house.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:36 GMT-3