From: Bauer, Rick (BAUERR@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Aug 23 2002 - 08:26:47 GMT-3
With the exception of RIP V2 (it does support tagging). Route tagging is one
of those cool things to do when it comes to redistribution, access-lists,
prefix-lists, AD, as-path, and route-maps will do everything you need. IMHO.
Rick, #9482
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Snyder [mailto:msnyder@ldd.net]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 1:22 AM
To: 'Omer Ansari'
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: denying tagged routes when redist'ing into RIP/IGRP
No. My experience is that route maps and tags do not work into rip or
igrp.
An sometimes it doesn't work as expected from rip or igrp.
If it is just a few routes, a distribute list might be a better general
choice from a rip or igrp route donor.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Omer Ansari
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 6:14 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: denying tagged routes when redist'ing into RIP/IGRP
All,
knowing the IGRP/RIP engine doesnt know how to handle tags, is this
allowed or do have to stick with ACLs?
router igrp 100 (or rip)
redistribute ospf 10 route-map TagBoy metric ......
!
route-map TagBoy deny 10
match tag 90
route-map TagBoy permit 20
!
regards,
Omer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:35 GMT-3