From: Fred Ingham (fingham@xxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 20 2002 - 17:47:34 GMT-3
The internal network numbers should be unique but the network numbers can
also be different. The master (higher internal network number) will
determine the actual network number used in ipxwan exchanges. The network
numbers chosen can be any valid network numbers but must also be unique in
the network.
In the CCO example CHICAGO has the higher internal network number (6666) so
the network 100 will be used in the ipxwan packet exchanges.
HTH, Fred
----- Original Message -----
From: <ted.mcdermott@exeloncorp.com>
To: <zpnist@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: RE: IPXWAN config
> Peng,
>
> The internal network, 6666, should be unique from the NYC-AS internal
> network number, 1000. I don't understand, however, why one side has
external
> network 100 while the other is 101. I believe these should be equal!
>
> Ted
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peng Zheng [mailto:zpnist@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 3:07 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: IPXWAN config
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not understand this:
> under:
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/atip
> x_r/ipx/2rdipx2.htm#xtocid23
>
> There is some config like this:
>
> interface serial 1
> no ipx network
> encapsulation ppp
> ipx ipxwan 6666 100 CHICAGO-AS
>
>
> On the remote router (NYC-AS):
>
> interface serial 0
> no ipx network
> encapsulation ppp
> ipx ipxwan 1000 101 NYC-AS
>
>
> I don't understand the network-number part, shouldn't
> these values on the two routers be same? If I do not
> use unnumbered, how should I choose the value for both
> routers?
>
> Thank you for help.
>
> Best Wishes,
> Peng Zheng
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:31 GMT-3