Frame-Relay InARP

From: Antoine DELEPORTE (antoine.deleporte@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 20 2002 - 08:02:02 GMT-3

• Next message: William Wong Kun Sing: "ACL to block /29 route?"
• Previous message: Peng Zheng: "RE: IPX config"
• Next in thread: ccie candidate: "Re: Frame-Relay InARP"
• Maybe reply: ccie candidate: "Re: Frame-Relay InARP"
• Maybe reply: Michael Snyder: "RE: Frame-Relay InARP"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hi all,

I have a question about Frame Relay InARP that drives me crazy :
according to Solie's book, the "no arp frame-relay" and "no frame-relay inverse
-arp" commands respectively disable the sending of inARP request & inARP respon
se. But...

R1------( FR ) --------R2

R1 & R2 are connected via FR, with standard interfaces.
R1 is configured with "no arp frame-relay" & "no frame-relay inverse-arp". R2 i
sn't configured with this commands.
I have dynamics mappings on R1 & R2 !!! Is it normal ?( IOS versions are 12.1(2
) & I rebooted routers...)
How can I force R1 not to learn about R2 mappings without making any change on
R2 ?
Does the "no arp frame-relay" command really works ?

I know this question looks simple, but there isn't much info on "arp frame-rela
y" command on cco...
Please help !

Thanks in advance.
Antoine

• Next message: William Wong Kun Sing: "ACL to block /29 route?"
• Previous message: Peng Zheng: "RE: IPX config"
• Next in thread: ccie candidate: "Re: Frame-Relay InARP"
• Maybe reply: ccie candidate: "Re: Frame-Relay InARP"
• Maybe reply: Michael Snyder: "RE: Frame-Relay InARP"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:30 GMT-3