From: ccie candidate (ccie1@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 20 2002 - 01:29:55 GMT-3
ok i would do the same .
however my question was about the network assigned by the IPXWAN command
ipx ipxwan 0 16 R1
where 16 is the assigned network for the link by the command ( or i understand
it like that )
this network shows in the routing table as "W" however it dont propagate with N
LSP
any comments
--On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 23:08:54 Fred Ingham wrote: >The configuration guides still have ipxwan as a configuration step in >enabling ipx nlsp over a point-to-point serial interface. It works without >the ipxwan but the costs are different when configuring with ipxwan and when >just using ipx enable nlsp. If asked to configure it I would use ipxwan. >When using ipxwan there is no network number assigned to the interface. > >Fred >----- Original Message ----- >From: "ccie candidate" <ccie1@lycos.com> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com> >Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:40 AM >Subject: NLSP and IPXWAN > > >> folks; >> when running nlsp over wan (serial ) one must use ipxwan ...right ?? >> >> i read this somewhere multiple times ...i beleive it is right unless >someone has different opinion . >> >> >> when i config ipxwan i noticed that the network of the ipxwan link didnt >show up in the far end routers ..is this normal ??? >> >> >> say >> R1-----R2------R3 >> >> R1R2 connection is serial running ipxwan ,while R2R3 is ethernet. >> >> on r1 >> int ser 0 >> ipx ipxwan aa 12 r1 >> ! >> on r2 >> int ser 0 >> ipx ipxwan bb 12 r2 >> ! >> >> now NLSP is running for R1 ,R2,R3 >> >> >> on R3 , the network 12 didnt show up ..however the internal network AA and >BB showed normally ... >> >> >> is this normal ? >> >> >> >> >> >>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:30 GMT-3