From: Brian McGahan (brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Aug 19 2002 - 13:30:28 GMT-3
Armand,
Don't put interesting traffic on the remote side. Assuming this
is only a point-to-point dial scenario, and the local side is in backup,
there will never be a case where the remote side should be dialing at
all.
Also, "debug dialer packet" will give you more detailed information
about what traffic is interesting or not.
HTH
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
Director of Design and Implementation
brian@cyscoexpert.com
CyscoExpert Corporation
Internetwork Consulting & Training
http://www.cyscoexpert.com
Voice: 847.674.3392
Fax: 847.674.2625
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Armand D
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:06 AM
To: kasturi cisco; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Backup Interface and IGRP
Hi,
I am prevented from using snapshot and watch-lists.
I'm trying to use the backup interfcace so this router
only dials when it loses connectivity on its primary
port. It appears that igrp brings the call back up
from the remote side from the show dialer cmd: Dial
reason: ip (s=135.4.35.6, d=255.255.255.255)
Is there any way to prevent this call back issue ?
Thanks,
Armand
--- kasturi cisco <kasturi_cisco@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Armand,
>
> If u look at the debugs (maybe easier in lab to use
> the show dialer cmd as
> this generates less amount of info than
> debug)...gives similiar info for
> troubleshooting...The show dialer cmd will show the
> dial reason which helps
> to find why link is going UP/DOWN
>
> When u look at the output it shows bcast as dest
> address
> >
> >1w3d: BRI0/0: ip (s=135.4.35.5, d=255.255.255.255),
> >186 bytes, outgoing interesting (list 100)
>
> The router with Src address shown above is
> generating IGRP routing updates
> and hence these updates. To the best of my knowledge
> the ways to do this is
>
> - if u deny igrp routing updates and use static
> routes (may not be a option)
>
> - USe snapshot routing as this prevents the DV
> protcols form sending updates
> every "update interval"
>
> I cant think of any other way ? anyone care to add
> ??
>
> HTH.Are u prevented from using Snapshot ?? by the Q
> or Secenario.
>
> Good luck,
> kasturi.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:29 GMT-3