From: Phil (ciscostudent1@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Aug 18 2002 - 14:04:38 GMT-3
Jon,
Ring 31 is needed to represent the ethernet segment to the TokenRing world. Wit
hout it htere will be no way to have packet exchange between the tokenring and
ethernet segments.
Phil
Jon O'Nan <jononan@columbus.rr.com> escreveu: Can someone explain to me why a
virtual ring is needed on Router A - the dlsw
peer with the ethernet segment.
Thanks
Jon
http://cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_c/bcp
rt2/bcddlsw.htm#36509
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Router A
hostname Router A
!
.
.
.
source-bridge ring-group 31
dlsw local-peer peer-id 128.207.111.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 128.207.1.145
dlsw bridge-group 5
!
interface loopback 0
ip address 128.207.111.1 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet 0
no ip address
bridge-group 5
!
.
.
bridge 5 protocol ieee
!
.
Router B
hostname Router B
!
.
.
.
source-bridge ring-group 500
source-bridge transparent 500 1000 1 5
dlsw local-peer peer-id 128.207.1.145
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 128.207.111.1
dlsw bridge-group 5
.
.
interface loopback 0
ip address 128.207.1.145 255.255.255.0
interface ethernet 1/2
no ip address
bridge-group 5
.
.
.
interface tokenring 2/0
no ip address
ring-speed 16
source-bridge 7 1 500
source-bridge spanning
!
.
.
.
bridge 5 protocol ieee
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:28 GMT-3