Re: map-class frame-relay

From: ccie candidate (ccie1@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Aug 18 2002 - 07:48:56 GMT-3

• Next message: ccie candidate: "RE: Bridging over FR hub and spoke"
• Previous message: Colin Barber: "RE: Are EIGRP external routes preferable than OSPF ext ??"
• Maybe in reply to: Peng Zheng: "map-class frame-relay"
• Next in thread: Michael Snyder: "RE: map-class frame-relay"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
traffic-shape rate is GTS
frame traffic-rate is FRTS single command for Bc,Be,CIR
frame CIR
frame Bc,
Frame Be
separate command for each parameter

--
On 18 Aug 2002 08:51:23 -000
 Prakash H Somani wrote:
>Hi,
>
>in Command oen I think u want to use "Traffic-shape rate <> <>
>command".
>
>This one is GTS and when u want your traffic shaping to be applied
>to interface u should use this command.
>
>Rest is to be used uner Class=Map....to be applied to the DLCI.
>
>Friends correct me if I m wrong in my understanding.
>
>regards....Prakash
>On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 Peng Zheng wrote :
>>Hi,
>>
>>I don't know what's the relationship between
>>
>>frame-relay traffic-rate average [peak]
>>
>>and
>>
>>frame-relay cir(mir, bc,be).
>>
>>If I'm asked to configure, how can I determine which
>>one I should use or I should use both.
>>
>>Thank you for help.
>>
>>Best Wishes,
>>Peng Zheng
>>
>>

• Next message: ccie candidate: "RE: Bridging over FR hub and spoke"
• Previous message: Colin Barber: "RE: Are EIGRP external routes preferable than OSPF ext ??"
• Maybe in reply to: Peng Zheng: "map-class frame-relay"
• Next in thread: Michael Snyder: "RE: map-class frame-relay"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:28 GMT-3