From: Peng Zheng (zpnist@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Aug 16 2002 - 14:49:08 GMT-3
I know that. But R1 and R2 must know how to get lo0 of
the other end, right? I know maximum-paths should be
used. Because static route is not allowed, Does that
mean I must configure IGP between ASs? Does it make
sense to run IGP between ASs?
--- CCIE <o_daramola@hotmail.com> wrote:
> ok I guess i didn't understand you. Bgp establishes
> its peer relationships
> using tcp. You will need an existing igp (or static
> routes) to be able to
> use the lo0 interface as the bgp peer. Once that is
> done, only one bgp route
> will be injected into the routing table and your two
> links will be redundant
> but not load balanced. The maximum-paths command
> allows bgp to inject two
> equal cost routes into the routing table.
>
> Yinka
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> To: "Hotmail" <o_daramola@hotmail.com>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:05 AM
> Subject: Re: EBGP Load Balance
>
>
> > I have no equipments to test. But I think R1 and
> R2
> > must have the route to lo0 of other end.
> >
> >
> > --- Hotmail <o_daramola@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > try maximum-paths 2
> > >
> > > Yinka
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:47 AM
> > > Subject: EBGP Load Balance
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have this config.
> > > >
> > > > R1 in AS 100.
> > > > R2 in AS 200.
> > > >
> > > > There are two serial links between them.
> > > > One on 192.168.1.0/30
> > > > One on 192.168.2.0/30
> > > >
> > > > I want to do load balance on these two links.
> R1
> > > has
> > > > Lo0 with 1.1.1.0/24. R2 has Lo0 with
> 2.2.2.0/24.
> > > >
> > > > I know I need to add ebgp-multi and
> update-source
> > > > under BGP config.
> > > >
> > > > But I need to config the routes to let R1 and
> R2
> > > know
> > > > how to get each other.
> > > >
> > > > I found config with static route like:
> > > >
> > > > on R1:
> > > >
> > > > ip route 2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.2
> > > > ip route 2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.2
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > But for LAB, static routes are not allowed.
> How
> > > can I
> > > > implement this config without static route?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for help.
> > > >
> > > > Best Wishes,
> > > > Peng Zheng
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:27 GMT-3