From: Chris Hugo (chrishugo@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Aug 11 2002 - 22:59:54 GMT-3
Thank you all for clarification.
chris hugo
Balaji Siva wrote:Chris,
yes, CBP or GTS could be used.
Now there is something called CB shaping. !!!! ... now whether the lab
routers will be able to implement them is a different question due to
platform/code level.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos
_c/fqcprt4/qcfcbshp.htm
I suggest that you read up the qos configuration guide as there is more good
information on it.
Balaji
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Chris Hugo
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Michael Snyder; 'Balaji Siva'
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: QOS Question from Routopia LAB 3
Hi All,
So is it fair to say that CB-WFQ and GTS can both apply to Routopia lab 3.
The only deference would be that CB-WFQ would not have a reservoir to store
traffic that exceeds the specified rate AND if we do decide to implement GTS
the reservoir will be available.
Since the Routopia lab 3 is a little vague on what their exact requirements
are both GTS and CB-WFQ is a viable solution.
Is this correct statements I have made??? Please correct my conclusions for
myself if I am wrong.
thank you,
chris hugo
Michael Snyder wrote: I stand corrected. So if it does run out of tokens
and queues the
packet, that queued packet can't be sent till the next time interval
anyway. Thus the limiting function is still preserved.
I was thinking it was just a general realtime interface queue. But if
that was the case, then it would defeat the whole purpose of GTS.
Thanks,
This email thread was time well spent for me.
Michael
P.S. Did anyone else catch the inconstancy of the feature name GTS, and
it's limiting functions? To me, CQ is a shaper, and GTS is a policer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Balaji Siva [mailto:bsivasub@cisco.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 12:08 PM
To: msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: QOS Question from Routopia LAB 3
mike,
why not ? shaping would allow only 10 % per time interval...it doesn't
matter which time interval i send it
..here is the question again
"Ping traffic can only utilize 10% of available bandwidth."
how are you violating the rule with shaping ?
Balaji
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Snyder [mailto:msnyder@ldd.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 1:03 PM
To: 'Balaji Siva'
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: QOS Question from Routopia LAB 3
I forgot about the queueing if it ran out of tokens. I was only
thinking of the limiting function.
So if it will queue packets without a token, and send the packet anyway,
then my GTS answer won't work.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:23 GMT-3