From: Balaji Siva (bsivasub@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Aug 11 2002 - 14:07:49 GMT-3
mike,
why not ? shaping would allow only 10 % per time interval...it doesn't
matter which time interval i send it
..here is the question again
"Ping traffic can only utilize 10% of available bandwidth."
how are you violating the rule with shaping ?
Balaji
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Snyder [mailto:msnyder@ldd.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 1:03 PM
To: 'Balaji Siva'
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: QOS Question from Routopia LAB 3
I forgot about the queueing if it ran out of tokens. I was only
thinking of the limiting function.
So if it will queue packets without a token, and send the packet anyway,
then my GTS answer won't work.
-----Original Message-----
From: Balaji Siva [mailto:bsivasub@cisco.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 11:48 AM
To: \mit Askan (TK-Network Gvz|mleri); 'Michael Snyder'
Cc: Ccie (E-mail)
Subject: RE: QOS Question from Routopia LAB 3
in your acl 103 will deny everything, you need ip permit any any at the
end.
but yes you can do this way with CAR ..AFAIK.
Now as far as the other discussion about shaping vs policing.
I think shaping (like GTS) would work in this case. it is also is the
max
allowed. policing would drop it ..shaping would queue it (but may drop
if
the queue is full)
This URL would give you some more thoughts on this discussion.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/105/policevsshape.html#minimum
Balaji
lab
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:23 GMT-3