From: CCIE FUN (ccieexam2002@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 07 2002 - 17:05:15 GMT-3
Edward, thanks for the reply, i have already tried all
of these things, i still don't think this will work.
if you can, show me the config.
--- Edward Monk <emonk@att.net> wrote:
> I suggest you enlighten yourself. Cisco
> documentation is notorious for
> leaving things out and having errors in it. Set up
> the configuration I
> have outlined and see if it works or not. You have
> all the information
> you need to test whether it works or not.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCIE FUN [mailto:ccieexam2002@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Edward Monk; 'Tony Russell';
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: redis ospf into bgp
>
> show me the configs and as Tony specified please
> visit
> this link to enlighten your knowledge.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/bgp-ospf-redis.html
>
> R1 and R5 will not see anything except their
> directly
> connected networks.
> i would be more than happy to back off if you can
> show
> me the configs.
>
> --- Edward Monk <emonk@att.net> wrote:
> > Well assurances are great but when they are wrong
> > they are wrong. This
> > redistribution is not working by magic. My
> > route-maps only specify match
> > ip address to prevent route feedback and nothing
> > else. Here is the
> > setup.
> >
> > I have 5 routers with the R1-R5.
> >
> > R3 is in the middle and only runs OSPF. R1 and R5
> > only run BGP. Loopback
> > from R5 in routing table of R1. Loopback R1 of is
> in
> > routing table of
> > R5.
> >
> > R1---bgp---R2---ospf---R3---ospf---R4--bgp---R5
> >
> > I perform mutual redistribution at R2 and R3 with
> > like commands as
> > specified previously. Loopbacks are reachable from
> > R1 to R5.
> >
> > So your telling me that it doesn't work? Explain
> to
> > me how it doesn't
> > work again? I suggest you take another look at
> this
> > in your lab. It
> > works in my lab without specifying match criteria
> > internal external as I
> > said before.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CCIE FUN [mailto:ccieexam2002@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 12:18 PM
> > To: Edward Monk; 'Tony Russell';
> > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: redis ospf into bgp
> >
> > Edward
> > What are you specifying under the route-map's
> > if you mentioned the route-map in your config's
> then
> > please include the route-maps also.
> >
> > i can assure you, that if you don't specify the
> > "internal external" keyword either under the
> > route-map
> > or directly in the redistribute statement
> > your ospf route's won't be redistributed ( this
> > means
> > desired results)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Edward Monk <emonk@att.net> wrote:
> > > What do you mean desired results? If you mean it
> > > won't redistribute I
> > > disagree. I am currently redistributing between
> > OSPF
> > > and BGP without
> > > specifying any match criteria. IOS v12.1(6) Not
> > that
> > > IOS version really
> > > matters as long as it does BGP and OSPF. My
> > commands
> > > are as follows.
> > >
> > > Router BGP 500
> > > redistribute ospf 1 metric 110 route-map
> > > no_feedback
> > >
> > > Router OSPF 1
> > > Redistribute bgp 500 metric 2000 metric-type 1
> > > subnets route-map
> > > no_feedback2
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > CCIE FUN
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 9:24 AM
> > > To: Tony Russell; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > > Subject: Re: redis ospf into bgp
> > >
> > > You need to specify the keywork "internal
> > external"
> > > in your redistribute ospf command under BGP
> > routing
> > > process.
> > > unless you specify that, you won;t see any
> desired
> > > results.
> > >
> > > Also with the the external keywork don't forget
> to
> > > specify 1 or 2 ( for external type 1 and type 2)
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Tony Russell <trussell@ibeam.com> wrote:
> > > > I have read that when you redis ospf into bgp
> > > that
> > > > the match
> > > > internal external .... is not required
> (meaning
> > > that
> > > > if you dont specify,
> > > > all ospf routes are redistributed. However, I
> > > just
> > > > saw an example where
> > > > they specified everything explicitly in the
> > > > redistribution command. Are
> > > > these extra statments necessary (all
> > redistributed
> > > > by default) or not
> > > > (nothing is redistributed) ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tony Russell
> > > > 12 days and counting.......
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:19 GMT-3