From: Tom Larus (tlarus@xxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 06 2002 - 06:25:56 GMT-3
I know the market is bad, but the tone of that job ad is downright
repellant. Do you really want to work for someone like that (unless you
have no other choice), or someone who hired whoever wrote that ad. Sounds
like someone with some issues about the CCIE (perhaps someone who failed
numerous times because it was "not real real world enough.") Also, it shows
some ignorance of certifications, because I am not sure if any Network
Certification out there has much to do with "Best Practices."
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Barber" <Colin.Barber@telewest.co.uk>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 11:59 PM
Subject: RE: Anti-CCIE's ?
> Maybe the job is not challenging enough for a CCIE and the employer knows
> that a CCIE would soon look for another job, or that a CCIE would only be
> taking the job to get work whilst still looking for something better?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jake [mailto:jakeczyz@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 06 August 2002 02:17
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: OT: Anti-CCIE's ?
>
>
> Sorry about the OT, but here's a question relevant to most of us:
>
> Why do you suppose a company would post a job and specifically say
that
> they don't
> want to hear from any CCIE's? I'm a little surprised and outraged by this.
> Are there so
> many CCIE's in Chicago looking for work (other than yours truly) that they
> need to put
> this stipulation in the description to keep a few hundred otherwise
> unqualified CCIE's
> from flooding their recruiters' mail boxes? Has the telecom deep-6 left
this
> field that
> damaged? Has the credential now become a liability on my resume?
>
> <http://www.chicago.computerjobs.com/job_view.asp?jobid=1418164>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Jake
> 9102
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:17 GMT-3