From: Colin Barber (Colin.Barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:34:27 GMT-3
The book is a joke, I cannot believe that Cisco put their name to it. The
errata is longer than the content of some books and that still only has 25%
of the mistakes in the book!
I would not recommend the book to learn new topics as you need be familiar
with the topics so that you can tell if the text has a mistake in it or not.
The end labs are also very bad and the solutions even worse.
-----Original Message-----
From: Meyer, J. (Johan) [mailto:JohanMe@nedcor.com]
Sent: 05 August 2002 15:29
To: 'Colin Barber'; Meyer, J. (Johan); 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: LSAP Access-List for SNA
Yes I have seem many errors in this book this being another
You would think that because this book is Cisco Press there would not be so
many Mistakes?
Who proof reads these books as they should be fired!
Regards
Johan
-----Original Message-----
From: Colin Barber [ mailto:Colin.Barber@telewest.co.uk
<mailto:Colin.Barber@telewest.co.uk> ]
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 4:16 PM
To: 'Meyer, J. (Johan)'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: LSAP Access-List for SNA
0x0d0d 0x0000 is just one of the many thousand mistakes in Solie's book.
0x0000 0x0d0d is the correct filter for SNA
Colin
-----Original Message-----
From: Meyer, J. (Johan) [ mailto:JohanMe@nedcor.com
<mailto:JohanMe@nedcor.com> ]
Sent: 05 August 2002 14:49
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: LSAP Access-List for SNA
Please can we confirm the following
According to Karl Solie the ACL for LSAP's SNA is 0x0D0D 0x0000
However according to the DLSW Design guide you use 0x0000 0x0D0D
Will both of these achieve the same result?
Thanks
Johan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:16 GMT-3