From: yakout esmat (yesmat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Aug 05 2002 - 05:45:18 GMT-3
I was going to say that...:-)) too many
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
\mit Askan (TK-Network Gvz|mleri)
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 5:41 PM
To: 'Khurram Khani'
Cc: Ccie (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Redistributing BGP into RIP question
my last e-mail includes errors, please disregard it.
umit
-----Original Message-----
From: Khurram Khani [mailto:kkhani@nortelnetworks.com]
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 01:53
To: kym blair; Khurram Khani; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: ssubrA3@nortelnetworks.com
Subject: Re: Redistributing BGP into RIP question
Just forwarding Kym's reply to group for other fellows knowledge....
Thanks Kym.
----- Original Message -----
From: "kym blair" <kymblair@hotmail.com>
To: "Khani, Khurram [INGO1:8851:EXCH]" <kkhani@americasm06.nt.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: Redistributing BGP into RIP question
Khurram,
You are correct, the connected route wins over the BGP route, so
redistributing from BGP to RIP will not include the connected route.
You'll
have to redistribute connected also. If you only want this one
connected
route to be redistributed, use a route-map to permit only this one.
HTH, Kym
>From: "Khurram Khani" <kkhani@nortelnetworks.com>
>Reply-To: "Khurram Khani" <kkhani@nortelnetworks.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Redistributing BGP into RIP question
>Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:43:03 -0700
>
>Hi All,
>
>When I redistribute BGP into RIP using
>
>router rip
> redistribute bgp xx metric 1 <==== redistribution instruction
>
>
>Does above instruction redistributes BGP routes from 'BGP Table' into
RIP
>or
>it will redistribute only installed BGP routes
>from 'Routing table' into RIP??
>
>When I add a network statement for a connected interface in 'router
bgp' ,
>I
>see a prefix entry in bgp table
>with nexthop 0.0.0.0 but this route doesn't get redistributed in RIP
>(doing
>BGP to RIP redistribution on this
>router). I am assuming that since connected interface is present in
>Routing
>table as 'C' route not 'B' route
>thats why its not getting redistributed in RIP even though its a valid
>route
>in BGP table. Is this behaviour
>correct???
>
>comments appreciated
>
>thanks
>khurram.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:16 GMT-3