From: Ronny Jonathan (rjonathan@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Aug 02 2002 - 13:59:24 GMT-3
Dear Group,
I've been working on Advanced DLSW labs from fatkid.
On the solution page:
R2 and R4 use bridge-group 4 on their ethernet interface and dlsw bridge-group
4
in the dlsw config. At the same time R2 have a DLSW peering w/ R4.
Is this the right solution ? Would it cause a loop if we configure them in
such a way?
Should we use DLSW ethernet redundancy feature instead ?
The reason is I found the TX RX were increasing rapidly w/ show dlsw peer
until I remove R2 from bridge-group 4.
And when I did some searching I found that we need to use DLSW ethernet
redundancy
feature in such setup.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/dlswts3.html#topology
Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks !
Regards,
Ronny
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:14 GMT-3