From: Tom Larus (tlarus@xxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 01 2002 - 10:39:36 GMT-3
This link that someone just posted indicates that LLQ is THE way to go for
delay-sensitive traffic. I think we were worrying too much about the
language "more likely to drop than delay," which might send us away from
LLQ, and make us think about rate limiting. Rate limiting does not help our
delay sensitive traffic get there any faster than other traffic, though.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/wantqos.html#first
----- Original Message -----
From: "Casey, Paul (6822)" <Paul.Casey@o2.com>
To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 3:40 PM
Subject: Processing delay sensitive traffic.
> Hello,
>
> Can some help me with this
>
> Users on the local ethernet segment of Area 33 ABR are running a
> delay-sensitive application from a server
> Configure appropriate routers such that the application which uses udp
port
> 4700 will incur minimum processing
> delay and its packets are MORE lightly to be dropped than delayed.
>
>
> How you would you go about doing something like this..
>
>
>
> Paul Casey
> O2 Ireland
> Core Network Eng'g Team
> 76 Lower Baggot Street, Dublin 2.
> > * Mobile : +353 86 8143310
> E-mail: paul.casey@o2.com
>
> PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ABOVE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION I
>
> > See what you can do www.o2.ie
> >
>
>
>
****************************************************************************
************
>
> This E-mail is from O2. The E-mail and any files
> transmitted with it are confidential and may also be privileged and
intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> Any unauthorised direct or indirect dissemination, distribution or copying
> of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received the E-mail in error please notify postmaster@O2.com or
> telephone ++ 353 1 6095000.
>
>
****************************************************************************
*************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:13 GMT-3