Re: Processing delay sensitive traffic.

From: André Bersvendsen (an-bersv@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 01 2002 - 05:52:10 GMT-3

• Next message: Casey, Paul (6822): "RE: EIGRP (Impossible design ....???)"
• Previous message: Khalid Siddiq: "RE: EIGRP (Impossible design ....???)"
• Maybe in reply to: Omer Ansari: "Re: Processing delay sensitive traffic."
• Next in thread: Tom Larus: "Re: Processing delay sensitive traffic."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
>They also specified we should always use provisioned (Diffserv) QoS rather th
an signaled (RSVP)
>
When I was speaking with someone from IETF back in 1998 and he sayd that
"in the future RSVP vill be used in access and distribution, Diffserv
vill be used in core".

Do you think this make sense? Or was it to early to say back in 1998?

Regards,
Andri B.
CCIE #9253

• Next message: Casey, Paul (6822): "RE: EIGRP (Impossible design ....???)"
• Previous message: Khalid Siddiq: "RE: EIGRP (Impossible design ....???)"
• Maybe in reply to: Omer Ansari: "Re: Processing delay sensitive traffic."
• Next in thread: Tom Larus: "Re: Processing delay sensitive traffic."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:13 GMT-3