From: Tommy C (tkc9789@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 31 2002 - 19:52:59 GMT-3
Why not consider CBWFQ instead?
Tommy
>From: Jason Wydra <jasonwydra@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: Jason Wydra <jasonwydra@yahoo.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Rate limit (interface command)
>Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 21:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
>
>I'm doing a lab that requires rate limiting on Ethernet 0 to block any
>input www traffic that exceeds 128K. The lab does not say that I should
>allow any burst. The rate limit command does not allow you to enter a "0"
>value for normal or ecess burst. Therefore I have to allow at least 1000
>normal burst bytes and 2000 excess burst bytes. 1000 and 2000 is as low as
>it will let me go. Does anyone know a way around this or a reason why it
>works this way? Here is the command below under my Ethernet interface. The
>only way I can see getting around this is lowering the allowable bps from
>128000 down to 104000 so that when yo add up the normal and excess burst it
>will equal 128000.
>
>rate-limit input access-group 100 128000 1000 2000 conform-action transmit
>exceed-action drop
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jason
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:50 GMT-3