RE: Static Routes

From: Peng Zheng (zpnist@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 31 2002 - 17:24:26 GMT-3


   
What command can be used a substitute for summary
static route to null0 ?

Thank you for help.
--- Joe <GroupStudy@comcast.net> wrote:
> If they won't allow routes to null0, they'll
> explicitly tell you so, but it
> would never hurt to ask if there is ambiguity.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> McDermott, Ted
> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 3:27 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Static Routes
>
>
> Frequently, different Cisco Press books use the
> technique of creating a
> summary static route to null0 for the purpose of
> introducing a non-learned
> route into the routing table. Would that be
> considered a no-no in the exam,
> when they stipulate not to employ static routes?
>
>
>
************************************************************************
> This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain
> Exelon Corporation
> proprietary information, which is privileged,
> confidential, or subject
> to copyright belonging to the Exelon Corporation
> family of Companies.
> This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the
> individual or entity
> to which it is addressed. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this
> e-mail, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution,
> copying, or action taken in relation to the contents
> of and attachments
> to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have
> received this e-mail in error, please notify the
> sender immediately and
> permanently delete the original and any copy of this
> e-mail and any
> printout. Thank You.
>
************************************************************************
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:50 GMT-3