FTP- DATA or gt 1023 ?

From: kpalmer (kip.palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jul 28 2002 - 04:26:15 GMT-3

• Next message: kym blair: "Re: OSPF interface authentication (not area authent.)"
• Previous message: li jian hua: "ask a isdn question"
• Next in thread: alain faure: "Re: FTP- DATA or gt 1023 ?"
• Maybe reply: alain faure: "Re: FTP- DATA or gt 1023 ?"
• Maybe reply: Dan Pontrelli: "Re: FTP- DATA or gt 1023 ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Here's my concern.
I've got several references that conflict. When simply allowing
FTP services through the perimeter to a subnet or host on the
intranet, is it <ftp-data> or <gt 1023>?
The port 21 goes w/o question.

Solie says w/ confidence that a common mistake w/ FTP is
opening the ftp-data(port 20) when in fact a random port
above 1023 is what's needed.

I'll be labbing it out while waiting for feedback.

KPalmer

• Next message: kym blair: "Re: OSPF interface authentication (not area authent.)"
• Previous message: li jian hua: "ask a isdn question"
• Next in thread: alain faure: "Re: FTP- DATA or gt 1023 ?"
• Maybe reply: alain faure: "Re: FTP- DATA or gt 1023 ?"
• Maybe reply: Dan Pontrelli: "Re: FTP- DATA or gt 1023 ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:47 GMT-3