From: Anthony Pace (anthonypace@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 27 2002 - 15:20:17 GMT-3
I had it ewith RIP and EIGRP. I even used neigbors (thinking that the
unicast would wake up the SVC) At one point I saw every other RIP going
out and then the routes started aging out and no more updates. I saw a
message indicating that we were seeing and ignoring our own update. The
sub-interfaces fixed it
Anthony PACe
On 27 Jul 2002 15:32:09 -0000, "Prakash H Somani"
<pdsccie@rediffmail.com> said:
>
> I have also noticed this...I tried to increase the deactivation
> period of SVC...but I could not find the parameter...
>
> I also tried to reduce eigrp hello time...which should ideally
> become interesting packet and keep the SVC up...but that also did
> not work...!!!!@@@@
>
> Anybody can help please ??
> regards...Prakash
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2002 Anthony Pace wrote :
> >So what is it in Split-Horizons which causes the routers not to
> >send
> >each other routes when defined on phisical interfaces? They still
> >would
> >never need to send an advertisemnet out the same interface they
> >learned
> >it from. I saw a debug message where they would see their own
> >advertisment and ignore it. (it scrolled off the screen or I
> >would have
> >printed it) Also, after a while they never sent advertisments at
> >all.
> >That why I was thinking maybe the SVC tore itself down somehow,
> >but an
> >"interesting" ping could wake it up.
> >
> >Anthony Pace
> >
> >
> >
> >Remeber Split-Horizon behaves the same on ATM as it does on Frame
> >Relay
> >
> >Johan
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> > From: Anthony Pace [mailto:anthonypace@fastmail.fm]
> >Sent: 24 July 2002 08:51
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: ATM SVC prefering a subinterface over a phisical
> >
> >
> >
> >I have had this happen a couple of times and am wondering if it
> >there is something I am missing. When I set up an ATM SVC on a
> >main interface it works fine and pings work but I notice, over
> >time, distance vector routing protocols stop going accross the
> >link. When I defince the circuit as a subinterface it works fine.
> >Here are the configs. Is there something which would cause the
> >SCV to close, over time?
> >
> >Anthony Pace
> >
> >R2 ATM on Main Int
> >
> >interface ATM1/0
> > ip address 10.12.0.2 255.255.0.0
> > atm uni-version 3.1
> > atm esi-address 222222222222.00
> > no atm ilmi-keepalive
> > atm arp-server nsap
> >47.009181000000000532FC2901.111111111111.00
> > pvc 0/5 qsaal
> > !
> > pvc 0/16 ilmi
> > !
> >
> >R1 ATM on Main Int
> >
> >interface ATM1/0
> > ip address 10.12.0.1 255.255.0.0
> > atm uni-version 3.1
> > atm esi-address 111111111111.00
> > no atm ilmi-keepalive
> > atm arp-server self
> > pvc 0/5 qsaal
> > !
> > pvc 0/16 ilmi
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
> >NOW THE SAME CIRCUIT DEFINED ON SUB INTERFACE
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
> >R2
> >interface ATM1/0
> > no ip address
> > atm uni-version 3.1
> > no atm ilmi-keepalive
> > pvc 0/5 qsaal
> > !
> > pvc 0/16 ilmi
> > !
> >!
> >interface ATM1/0.2 multipoint
> > ip address 10.12.0.2 255.255.0.0
> > atm esi-address 222222222222.00
> > atm arp-server nsap
> >47.009181000000000532FC2901.111111111111.00
> >!
> >
> >
> >
> >R1
> >interface ATM1/0
> > no ip address
> > atm uni-version 3.1
> > no atm ilmi-keepalive
> > pvc 0/5 qsaal
> > !
> > pvc 0/16 ilmi
> > !
> >!
> >interface ATM1/0.2 multipoint
> > ip address 10.12.0.1 255.255.0.0
> > atm esi-address 111111111111.00
> > atm arp-server self
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> > Anthony Pace
> > anthonypace@fastmail.fm
> >--
> >The fastest email on the Internet!
> >http://fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your
> >own
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:46 GMT-3