RE: Merge SPIDS

From: Greg Shonting (gshonting@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 26 2002 - 12:05:04 GMT-3

• Next message: yakout esmat: "RE: Cisco type 5 password decrypter"
• Previous message: Armand D: "loopback interface in OSPF"
• Maybe in reply to: ccie candidate: "Merge SPIDS"
• Next in thread: ccie candidate: "RE: Merge SPIDS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
What version of code are you using? 12.0.7(T) has a bug that shows the spids a
nd not valid when they are actually working properly.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Francois Vaillancourt [mailto:hans@cam.org]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 2:47 AM
To: ccie candidate; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Merge SPIDS

At 2002-07-25, ccie candidate wrote:
>isdn spid1 0555100001
>
>show isdn status ....show spid1 NOT valid .
>
>is there certain format to insert it into my router ?

Try putting a LDN, should clear up the message. With Basic-NI it should
still work without it, but with other switch types it may be important if
you want to accept calls on the second B channel.

for much more see

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_invalid_spid.html

JF

• Next message: yakout esmat: "RE: Cisco type 5 password decrypter"
• Previous message: Armand D: "loopback interface in OSPF"
• Maybe in reply to: ccie candidate: "Merge SPIDS"
• Next in thread: ccie candidate: "RE: Merge SPIDS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:45 GMT-3