From: Anthony Pace (anthonypace@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jul 25 2002 - 16:07:54 GMT-3
So what is it in Split-Horizons which causes the routers not to send
each other routes when defined on phisical interfaces? They still would
never need to send an advertisemnet out the same interface they learned
it from. I saw a debug message where they would see their own
advertisment and ignore it. (it scrolled off the screen or I would have
printed it) Also, after a while they never sent advertisments at all.
That why I was thinking maybe the SVC tore itself down somehow, but an
"interesting" ping could wake it up.
Anthony Pace
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:01:32 +0000, "Perminder Grewal"
<percy_gunner@hotmail.com> said:
> Mark
>
> Also don't forget split-horizon's on the frame-relay for IGRP and DV
> protocols. Split horizon is disabled on the physical interface but not
> on
> sub-if.
>
> Percy
>
>
> >From: "Snow, Mark" <Mark.Snow@newcome.com>
> >Reply-To: "Snow, Mark" <Mark.Snow@newcome.com>
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: CCIE Practical Studies, Darth Reid, and Redistribution
> >Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:31:00 -0400
> >
> >All -
> >
> >I am having difficulties with Section V of the Lab Practice exam "Darth
> >Reid" in Solie's book, CCIE Practical Studies Volume 1.
> >I have completed the Lab, and for the most part gotten all the parts to
> >work, and have downloaded the answer PDFs from the CiscoPress web site.
> >
> >I really do not agree with some of the solutions that they give for this
> >specific lab, and was wondering if anyone had any insight (maybe someone
> >who
> >has taken this practice lab) as to why they answer the way they do.
> >Also does anyone have any really good ref material (links) for
> >redistribution?
> >
> >Specifically, the answer PDF has most of the routing protocols ALL
> >redistributing into each other, (OSPF into IGRP, and IGRP into OSPF, OSPF
> >into EIGRP, and EIGRP into OSPF) (even OSPF into RIP on router R3 when the
> >lab specifically states NOT to advertise Lab routes onto the backbone - so
> >there is no need for this).
> >I am also getting a lot of routing loops due to this and right now I am
> >clueless.
> >
> > > Mark Snow
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:43 GMT-3