From: Armand D (ciscoworks2001@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 23 2002 - 18:26:51 GMT-3
Hi,
My questoin says to use the DLCIs provided (101 and
102). It also asks me to configure without frame-relay
interface-dlci command.
Will this be possible if DLCIs don't match ?
thanks,
Armand
--- \mit_A~kan_(TK-Network_Gvz|mleri)
<umit.askan@probil.com.tr> wrote:
>
> at the dce side :
>
> frame-relay switching
> int s0
> frame-relay intf-type dce
>
> and your dlci mappings must match, use 101 or 102 at
> both sides.
>
> hope this helps
> umit
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Armand D [mailto:ciscoworks2001@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 23:01
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Frame Relay NO Sub-interfaces
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has a sample config for a
> Frame Relay back to back using no subinterfaces. I
> have the following configurations on my routers.
> Both
> routers show interface status UP DOWN and PVC status
> inactive.
>
>
> DTE Side:
>
> Interface s0
> encap frame-relay
> ip add 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> frame-Relay map ip 10.0.0.2 101 broadcast
> frame-relay lmi-type cisco
>
> DCE Side:
> Ineterface s0
> encap frame-relay
> ip add 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
> Frame-Relay map ip 10.0.0.1 102 broadcast
> clock rate 128000
> frame-relay lmi-type cisco
>
>
> Any tips would be great.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Armand
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:41 GMT-3