From: Tom Larus (tlarus@xxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 23 2002 - 12:23:40 GMT-3
The bridge group number on each router does not have to have any relation to
the Catalyst VLAN id number. I am even now working on a transparent
bridging lab in which my bridge group number on the routers is 1 while the
pertinent vlan on the Cat is vlan 13. On the Cat I have to say sh spantree
13 to see what is going on, while on the routers I say sh spannin 1. It is
all the same spanning tree, though. I believe that the bridge-group number
on each router is locally significant on each router, but I have not tested
it.
I am not sure whether the bridge-group numbers on the routers might somehow
become significant with DLSW, but I can be pretty certain that the Cat VLAN
id number will have no impact whatsoever on the DLSW bridge-g number.
----- Original Message -----
From: "jinqiang yu" <yujq2008@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:06 AM
Subject: dlsw bridge-group # and Cat5k vlan id
> hi guys,
>
> I am confusing about the the relaction between dlsw
> bridge-group number and Cat5k vlan id. For example,the
> topo like this,R2(E0)----Cat5K(2/1).2/1 of Cat5K is in
> vlan 10.Can the dlsw bridge# be 10 or must be 10?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> yujq
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:40 GMT-3