From: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki (karwas@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jul 21 2002 - 02:32:02 GMT-3
Better yet:
Make all your routers loopbacks in IGP before going any further.
And use next-hop self in iBGP.
But unfortunately, this is sometimes in contradiction to Lab
requirements.
That is why CCIE is so different from production network and
consequently so difficult (at least for me). "Have it done ugly,
and sustain half broken design, but make sure you can ping
everything..."
Przemek
On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 00:37, Nick Shah wrote:
> hint... Use tags...
>
>
> rgds
> Nick
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kelly Cobean <kcobean@earthlink.net>
> To: ccielab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 1:52 PM
> Subject: Driving me crazy!!!
>
>
> > All,
> > I have a question about the BGP routing lab from FatKid.com
> > (http://www.fatkid.com/html/325_bgp_routing.html) Requirement #7 says,
> > "Redistribute EIGRP into BGP so that R1 can reach all addresses within
> > AS200. Make sure that routes that originated in AS100 appear with the
> > correct AS-PATH on R1." I have accomplished the first part of this, with
> R1
> > being able to reach all addresses in AS200, but I cannot get the routes
> from
> > AS100 to appear at all on R1. Can someone look at the solution and tell
> me
> > what I'm doing wrong? Thanks!
> >
> > Kelly Cobean
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:38 GMT-3