From: ccie candidate (ccie1@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 19 2002 - 16:44:35 GMT-3
absolutely right :)
i knew what you have said ,however i was working in class c addresses and misse
d up that this will happen anyway either i used summarization or not :)))
thanks
--On Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:41:58 Ivan wrote: >Hi, > >IGRP is a classfull (FLSM) routing protocol. >In your case where the subnet mask is different on IGRP and EIGRP domain, 2 is sues arise: > >1. When the routes are redistributed to IGRP and the routes are part of the ma jor network boundary as the interface sourcing the IGRP update, it will not be redistrbute because of the different in subnet mask. > >2. When the routes are redistributed to IGRP and the routes are not part of th e major network boundary as the interface sourcing the IGRP update, it will be automatically summarized to the major class boundary. > >I guess your case is in 2. >Thats the reason why the auto-summary command under your Eigrp router config d oes not work > >Regards, > >-----Original Message----- >From: "nobody@groupstudy.com" <nobody@groupstudy.com> on behalf of "ccie c andidate" <ccie1@lycos.com> >Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:29 PM >To: "ccielab@groupstudy.com" <ccielab@groupstudy.com> >Subject: EIGRP /IGRP > >guys ; >i have a scenario where EIGRP and IGRP are having the same AS number and redit ributing autmatically , the EIGRP domain have different subnets (masks) . >i disabled the auto-summary on all routers in eigrp domain including the redis t point ,however the routers in IGRP domain can see all the routes in EIGRP dom ain as if EIGRP summarized them . > >am i supposed to do this manually on EIGRP by using the summary address comman d ??? as per doyle vol 1 ? > >what am i missing here ? > > >candidate > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:37 GMT-3