From: Scott Livingston (scottl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 19 2002 - 11:57:18 GMT-3
Please, someone correct me if I am wrong.
The answer to your first question is "NO". The other interfaces will
not go down as a RESULT of HSRP; obviously if we are talking about
subinterfaces they could, depending on the designed solution or whatever
caused the original interface to drop, but not as a result of HSRP,
rather FR, or even an ATM setup could be the demise of the remaining
interfaces.
The answer to your second question is it "Depends". What I mean by that
is the routing protocol will be the decision maker on destination
traffic. If the original link is still the best route then it will be
traversed - if the gear is configured to do so. On the other hand, if
by defaulting to the new router you are sourcing from a better metric
you will take the new link to your destination. I am sure some others
can think of a few more hypothetical scenarios for this one, but
hopefully this gives you some food for thought.
Scott
Sprint E|Solutions
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
chenyan
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 2:54 AM
To: ccielab
Subject: hsrp track problem?
hi,guys,
when configging the hsrp track for more than one serial links, I got a
problem:
when one tracked serial link down, the active router will reduce it
priority by 10 default, if it's priority is less than the priority of
standby router, it is possible that the standby router will change to a
active router? If it does,
will the other tracked serial links of the original active router
shutdown ?
will the traffic through the original good serial link be changed to
flow through the present active router?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:36 GMT-3