RE: IGRP Problem

From: Ivan (limmt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 19 2002 - 00:34:06 GMT-3


   
Hi,

To me, I think thtats the only way to overcome this using a static pointing to
null. Unless you run other routing protocols on the T0 interface that can summa
rize the route (EIGRP, OSPF) and redistribute into IGRP.

What do the group thinks.

Regards,
Ivan Lim

-----Original Message-----
From: "nobody@groupstudy.com" <nobody@groupstudy.com> on behalf of "alex f
ayn" <afayn@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 11:11 AM
To: "ccielab@groupstudy.com" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: IGRP Problem

The protocol on R4 and R5 is IGRP the network 137.5.44.0/27 dose not show up in
 R5 routing table. I know I can do ip route 137.5.44.0 255.255.255.0 null 0 an
d redistribute static in igrp and it should work. I wonder if any body has anot
her solution where you dont use static routes.

T0/0-137.5.44.4 /27

      |

      |

      |

    R4

        \ S0/0-137.5.45.4/24

          \

          FR

            \

             \

              \ S0/0-137.5.45.5/24

              R5

---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:36 GMT-3