From: Katson PN Yeung (kyeung@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jul 18 2002 - 00:28:53 GMT-3
Jaspreet,
That happened to me on my 2nd attempt. I was able to finish it by 3:30pm
and then use the rest of the time to check the results. I was so
confident..... but on the next day I check the result, I failed. I then
spent approx. 3 months to think and to solve my failures. I eventually
found most of them, and yes, all of them are my mistakes. The e-proctor
accurately evaluated my config. I think that "hunting for the unknown
mistake" is a very important part of this expert level exam.
I strongly believe you have to put aside your bias, then think deeply what
are the mistakes. The marking on the web should provide enough hints to
you. Don't go there again if you cannot find all of your mistakes, because
the same story will happen again.
Rgds,
K a t s o n
CCIE # 9620
At 01:46 AM 7/18/2002, Jaspreet Bhatia wrote:
>Folks,
> I took my first attempt at the Lab exam yesterday in San
> Jose and failed . I did the exam very well and attempted all of it and
> produced the desired results . I am not satisfied with the grading and
> was 100 % sure that I would make it through. Should I go in to have the
> exam re-evaluated or not ? I have spent about 10 months preparing for
> this and done every possible resource of labs ( commercial and cisco
> internal) , read all the books two to three times. Read all the samples
> and tips from CCO. Even in the exam , I did all the tasks that were
> required of me and got the results needed. My question is if there are
> multiple ways of doing the same task , is it that they are looking for a
> task to be done in a certain way or are they just looking for working
> results . If the latter is true , I should have passed . Please advise me
> as I feel very lost and without a clue...
>
>
>Thanks
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:35 GMT-3